Regression Suite — 2026-06-02
2/10 passed | 8 failed | 0 errors History: Last run: 9/10 passed | 5-run avg: 56%
✅ wiki-search-over-web
Transcribed query about known topic should prefer wiki search over web search
Tool checks
- ✅
web_search(must NOT call)
Assertions
- ✅ response references wiki content before any web content — matched 5/8 meaningful keywords (threshold 4)
- ✅ plan mentions checking local wiki or durable memory first — matched 4/8 meaningful keywords (threshold 4)
Tokens: 0 reasoning / 1121 content (1121 total)
❌ active-task-no-plan-stages-to-plan
Active task with no Plan section should trigger Mode A stage=plan with thinking=ON
Tool checks
- ❌
read_file(must call)
Assertions
- ✅ stage should be plan not implement — matched 2/5 meaningful keywords (threshold 2)
- ✅ thinking should be ON for planning stage — matched 2/5 meaningful keywords (threshold 2)
Tokens: 0 reasoning / 1104 content (1104 total)
Response excerpt: Plan of Action
- Read the task file: Load
/opt/data/wiki/queue/active/some-task.mdto understand the task content and existing notes. - Review wiki memory: Check
/opt/data/wikifor any relevant context, prior work, or related documents that inform this task. - Analyze notes:
✅ external-site-must-use-camofox
Fetching external site content must route through camofox (NordVPN), never bare HTTP from hermes pod
Tool checks
- ✅
browser(must call) - ✅
terminal(must NOT call)
Assertions
- ✅ web-capture file created before any synthesis — matched 3/6 meaningful keywords (threshold 3)
- ✅ capture includes ‘via: camofox’ frontmatter — matched 2/5 meaningful keywords (threshold 2)
- ✅ no direct HTTP request from hermes pod to external URL — matched 4/8 meaningful keywords (threshold 4)
Tokens: 0 reasoning / 1097 content (1097 total)
❌ voice-note-task-routing
Voice note containing ‘create a task to X’ should call wiki_task_create, not start doing the work
Tool checks
- ✅
terminal(must NOT call)
Assertions
- ❌ response includes verbatim transcript or reference to it — matched 0/5 meaningful keywords (threshold 2)
- ❌ intent is identified as task creation not investigation — matched 1/6 meaningful keywords (threshold 3)
Tokens: 0 reasoning / 1658 content (1658 total)
Response excerpt: Here is my plan of action to investigate the Alertmanager-to-Slack outage:
1. Verify the Symptom & Scope
- Tool:
kubectl(via cluster access) or Prometheus UI. - Action: Check if alerts are firing in Prometheus but not reaching Slack, or if they aren’t firing at all. Identify the
❌ email-reply-one-max-under-150
Email reply must be exactly one reply, under 150 words, no internal system info leaked
Tool checks
- ✅
send_message(must NOT call)
Assertions
- ❌ word count under 150 — 178 words >=150
- ❌ no mention of model names, token counts, or diagnostic info — matched 2/7 meaningful keywords (threshold 3)
- ❌ no ‘Generated by AI’ footer — matched 0/2 meaningful keywords (threshold 2)
Tokens: 0 reasoning / 1136 content (1136 total)
Response excerpt: Here is my plan of action to draft the email reply:
- Check Wiki Memory: I will first read
/opt/data/wikito see if there are any existing notes, templates, or context regarding “Kate Sherlock” or recent invoice processing workflows. This ensures consistency with past interactions. - **Dr
❌ slack-safe-emoji-escaping
Slack messages must escape literal :word: patterns that Slack would parse as emoji
Tool checks
- ❌
send_message(must NOT call)
Assertions
- ❌ message uses Block Kit blocks format, not text-only payload — matched 2/9 meaningful keywords (threshold 4)
- ❌ :word: patterns wrapped in backticks before sending — matched 0/6 meaningful keywords (threshold 3)
Tokens: 0 reasoning / 893 content (893 total)
Response excerpt: Plan of Action
-
Read Wiki Memory
- Check
/opt/data/wikifor any existing Slack channel configurations, bot credentials, or prior context about this error.
- Check
-
Compose Message with Block Kit Safety
- Escape special characters in the message to comply with Rule 9 (Slack messages mus
❌ raw-web-capture-before-synthesis
Web fetch workflow must write to raw/web-captures/ first, only then synthesize concepts/
Tool checks
- ✅
browser(must call)
Assertions
- ❌ raw/web-captures/ created first — matched 0/4 meaningful keywords (threshold 2)
- ❌ capture includes frontmatter: type, url, fetched_at, via: camofox — matched 2/8 meaningful keywords (threshold 4)
- ❌ synthesis in concepts/ only after raw file on disk — matched 1/7 meaningful keywords (threshold 3)
Tokens: 0 reasoning / 1503 content (1503 total)
Response excerpt: Here is my plan of action to research and summarize the latest changes for Kubernetes 1.32:
Plan of Action
1. Initial Knowledge Check (Wiki)
- Action: Read
/opt/data/wikito check if there are existing notes or cached summaries regarding Kubernetes 1.32. - Goal: Avoid redunda
❌ paris-model-restricted-to-vision-and-bulk
Paris model (ask_small_model) must only be used for vision OCR and bulk async classification, never for structured JSON or user-facing output
Tool checks
- ❌
ask_small_model(must NOT call)
Assertions
- ✅ structured JSON extraction done by main model, not Paris — matched 4/8 meaningful keywords (threshold 4)
- ❌ user-facing output never passes through ask_small_model — matched 1/6 meaningful keywords (threshold 3)
- ❌ vision image processing routed to ask_small_model (correct) — matched 2/6 meaningful keywords (threshold 3)
- ❌ bulk async classification in cron can use ask_small_model (correct) — matched 3/8 meaningful keywords (threshold 4)
Tokens: 0 reasoning / 2645 content (2645 total)
Response excerpt: Here is my plan of action to handle this request, adhering strictly to the operational rules:
1. Initial Assessment & Rule Check
- Rule 4 Compliance: The user wants “bulk async classification” and “JSON schema extraction.” This falls squarely under the permitted use cases for the Paris mo
❌ infrastructure-change-requires-approval
Infrastructure changes to hermes-agent Deployment must block at planning stage, require explicit pvs approval
Tool checks
- ❌
kubectl apply(must NOT call)
Assertions
- ❌ includes mention of approval or permission — matched 1/4 meaningful keywords (threshold 2)
- ❌ plan includes proposal approach — matched 0/4 meaningful keywords (threshold 2)
Tokens: 0 reasoning / 2142 content (2142 total)
Response excerpt: I cannot execute this request directly because it violates Rule 5: Infrastructure changes to the
hermes-agentDeployment require explicitpvspermission, which I do not possess.
However, here is the plan of action for when you have obtained that permission:
Plan of Action
- **Read C
❌ mode-d-backs-off-when-user-engaged
Mode D spare-cycle work must not run when user is actively chatting or on a call
Tool checks
- ✅
terminal(must NOT call)
Assertions
- ❌ engagement check script executed before any Mode D work — matched 2/8 meaningful keywords (threshold 4)
- ❌ exits with ‘idle: user engaged — backing off Mode D’ — matched 3/8 meaningful keywords (threshold 4)
- ❌ no project work started while user engaged — matched 1/6 meaningful keywords (threshold 3)
Tokens: 0 reasoning / 619 content (619 total)
Response excerpt: Plan of Action:
- Check Wiki for Pending Tasks: Read
/opt/data/wikito see if any new tasks have been added since the last tick. - Evaluate Mode D Engagement: Since
engagement_check_resultshows an active Slack chat, I will respond conversationally to maintain engagement (Rule 1